Bump pygments vendor to 2.19.2#47
Closed
ryanbrandenburg wants to merge 1 commit intoaboutcode-org:mainfrom
Closed
Conversation
|
I guess removing the ABOUT, NOTICE and license files is wrong, as this is used to properly attribute the source and its corresponding notices and licenses. |
| from typecode._vendor.pygments.util import get_choice_opt | ||
| from typecode._vendor.pygments.token import Token | ||
| from typecode._vendor.pygments.console import colorize | ||
| from src.typecode._vendor.pygments.formatter import Formatter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These src. namespaces look wrong, as the paths in src are the top-level modules, not src.
Author
|
Looks like this was accomplished in another way, closing. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should resolve #44 which is causing some upstream problems by crowding the output for scancode runs in ClearlyDefined.
I used vendy to do the move (as has apparently been done in the past), but it was unclear to me if there were any edits to be maintained or why we needed to vendor here in the first place (and if my changes preserved that need) so feedback is most welcome.